Leigh on Platform bed Emma an...
Frewin on Emma will tell the s...
howard on Platform bed Emma an...
InMyLife on It's that deep part ...
limine on It's that deep part ...
Frewin on A few weeks ago, hig...
Leigh on A few weeks ago, hig...
Angry Dog
Big Baton
China Musings
Cliches
Down to Nothing
Fidlmath
Ice Wishes
In My Life
Jackal
Pelican
PodChef
Ripple
Yoshick
today
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
visited *loading* times

This is hand of my son in the hand of his dying father. In just a few hours, that hand would be cold, white, and waxy, but here it is still living, loving.
I felt as if a weight had lifted today after I revealed this stuff about Mark and his sexual fantasies and my reactions to them to Pam, my therapist, and she said, "He was seriously damaged as a child." I knew this in an abstract way, but it made a difference having Pam give me the authoritative word on this. I asked her where such damage might come from, but she was unwilling to speculate. She also said that if I had stayed with Mark, that I wouldn't have "cured" him; this would have remained a problem. Knowing this with certainty allows me to forgive Mark. I suppose he couldn't help it, in a way. It also helps to know that these were his issues, and not mine, since he projected so much back onto me. So as it turns out, Mark has his own Memory Underground that he will probably never really confront. Is it possible that his obsession with the past is a way of skirting his own history, toying with his past in a slanted mirror? Thinking about this, I am remembering that Miriam's guilt over the loss of her brother was featured in Mark's story, and Mark has obsessively competitive, hostile feelings toward his own brother. It is impossible to know all that happened, but there are clues, like the way Mark flinches when his mother touches him, how guilt-ridden he felt when he left her while at the same time secretly despising both his parents in an extreme love/hate relationship. I feel an enormous sadness about it, but it's not a heavy sadness. . more the sadness of understanding.
Haiku for My Mother
Your withered hands fold
In the lap that once held me.
Two birds close to flight.
One of the truly maddening things about historians is their relentless control of the past. When I was with Mark, he never let a single "error" of mine go. If I was sick, if I wasn't charming at a dinner, if I was ever irritable, in a bad mood, he would bring these moments up years later as evidence of my flawed nature. Worse, he used email from four years back as evidence of my flaws in character. It didn't matter that most of our conversations had taken place on the phone, that I had spent months living with him. In the end, only these emails counted, and whenever I tried to present my own analysis of our situation, he would return to these emails to disprove everything I had to say, presenting his interpretation of them as inarguable. This was his successful technique in Memory Underground, where he disproved Miriam's memory by checking it against other documents and Nazi records. In the end, it mattered little what Miriam had to say about herself or what she presented to preserve her dignity--she was that which had to be corrected by the priest of truth, Mark, who could reveal her to herself. How maddening it was. In the end, I wished I had never sent him a single email, that I had put forth nothing that he could use to construct me as an avatar in the theater of his life.
Last night, I was reading the prison account of the nineteenth-century Irish patriot, Jeremiah O'Donovan Rossa, which includes some sad letters from his wife, the poet Mary. Rossa was deteriorating in prison, become more confrontational and angry, purposely aggravating the guards so that he was frequently in solitary confinement. He was, he said, reduced to a skeleton. But many of his troubles were self-made, because he refused to conform to the vicious discipline of the prison. Mary was devoting her time to fighting for clemency, but she was losing hope and sinking into a deep depression. Rossa's letters were infrequent. Though he was elected to the Irish parliament, he wasn't allowed to write, and so hid his smuggled ink bottle by attaching it to a black thread and lowering it through the bars outside the window. He called his wife, "Mollis": she called him "Cariss." But her love had come to its limit, and, as she imagined drowning herself in the Thames, she wrote to him (very wisely, I think): "One thing, Cariss, you may be sure of--I will never take the trouble for you or for any other man again. Human love is selfish, except in youth's first enthusiasm. It becomes a passion, living only as long as the object gives pleasure, and ceasing when the object thwarts the will, offends the vanity, or fails to minister to the self-love, pride, passion, or power of the pretended lover. You often said you loved me, but I never put your love to the proof; and never believed but that I did put it to the proof, I should find it wanting." What affinity I felt for Mary after reading this.